Encourage the usage of instructions in place of system_prompt by replacing existing examples and tests
#3687
+191
−228
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Docs Preview
|
…s://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-ai into hotfix-replace-system_prompt-with-instructions
DouweM
requested changes
Dec 11, 2025
| provider = OpenAIProvider(api_key=openai_api_key) | ||
| m = OpenAIResponsesModel('gpt-5', provider=provider) | ||
| settings = OpenAIResponsesModelSettings(openai_reasoning_effort='high', openai_reasoning_summary='detailed') | ||
| agent = Agent(m, system_prompt='You are a helpful assistant.', model_settings=settings) |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we're going to edit tests that have cassettes, we should re-record the cassettes.
Note that I'd be OK only updating this in the docs (for now).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
system_promptandinstructionsdo provide different behaviors, so I didn't replace all instances, but I tried replacing all that weren't specifically targeting that difference